Baker Energy
Brammer Engineering
Chevron Petroleum Technology
Condea Vista Co.
Conoco
Cooper Cameron
Duke Energy
El Paso Energy
El Paso Natural Gas
Entergy
Energy Solutions
Engage Energy
Exxon Company USA
Future Petroleum
Global Marine
Halliburton
Houston Industries
Pennzoil
Pacific Gas & Electric
Smith International
Sonat Exploration
Sonat Marketing
Tejas Gas
Transocean
Veco-APSC
Austin Software Foundry has engaged with oil and gas and energy sector clients throughout its history. After all, in Texas, it's hard to avoid the "oil patch." Here are a few examples:
Component and Framework Development
A Fortune 500 gas and electric utility company hired Austin Software Foundry to provide a customized version of its AdAPT base class library and to create a customized version of its Process Management for Object-Oriented Development course for use throughout its application development organization.
Technology Assessment and Software Development Process Improvement
Austin Software Foundry uses its assessments to help major oil and gas companies identify risks, as well as opportunities for improvement, in their software development projects. For example:One of the largest oil companies in the world hired ASF to evaluate one of its projects. The company's research and development division had ASF conduct a full assessement of a project to create the next generation of its reservoir simulation system.
ASF's assessment process begins with a review of key project information, including:
The Assessment generates two risk profiles. The first is a Project Profile that measures the inherent risk of the project across the following six dimensions:
The second risk profile produced is a Team Profile, using ASF's Environmental Readiness Assessment tool. It measures the maturity of the project team across two dimensions: 1) communication and collaboration, and 2) familiarity of the team with the underlying technologies and development approaches being used to develop the system.
These two profiles then are used to rate a team's ability to succeed. The ratings are grouped into four levels. Level I represents an appropriate Team Profile for a project with a relatively low Project Profile score (3.0 or below). Levels II through IV represent increasing levels of software development maturity; appropriate for increasingly complex projects.
Process and Project Mentoring
ASF helps many of its energy clients' project managers, architects and developers with:
Copyright 1989-2008 Austin Software Foundry, Inc.